Welcome To The Fishbowl.

A Synesthete’s Guide To The Most Beautiful Music In The World

This week, I’ve been feeling very artsy fartsy. It’s all this talk about color and my favorite artists. I blame the Daily Post. I’ve been listening to classical music for the last three days. I was talking with Male yesterday about the most beautiful music ever written. I said it’s Beethoven’s 9th symphony. He said, there’s no question that Beethoven’s 9th is the best piece ever written, but it’s not the most beautiful. This surprised me since, to me, they are the same thing.

What’s the difference between the best and the prettiest? I tried to separate them out, but couldn’t. I have music -> visual synesthesia, which means I see music as color, pattern and movement. Perhaps it’s my synesthesia that won’t allow me to see things as “technically great, but not beautiful” since I like what I like based on how visually beautiful it is. Visual takes precedence over auditory, but it goes both ways. When I look at art, I hear the music. I can look at a painting and see the music inside of it.

After Male’s ponderous supposition, I naturally asked him what is the most beautiful then? He didn’t really have an answer. I didn’t really have an answer either, so I decided to investigate it… with science! Actually, pseudo-science since I’m not a scientist. Whatever. Science shall be had, dammit.

This list only contains classical music since that is the prettiest music. There are some songs that are just beautiful that aren’t classical, but they can’t really compare to what’s on this list. Not only is it all classical, but it’s all for a full orchestra. I’m not all that fond of smaller pieces because they don’t have as much detail and therefore aren’t generally as colorful or visually interesting. So, after three days of clinical study of classical music, here is my list of the most beautiful orchestral pieces ever written from a synesthete’s perspective along with a representative work of art. The art isn’t exactly what I see since I didn’t create it, but it might give you a hint.

1. Beethoven.

Sorry, Male, but Beethoven’s 9th Symphony is still number one. Best and prettiest are synonymous in my brain. All of Beethoven is just stunning. If you’re going to listen to the 9th, you should really listen to the whole thing in order. It’s the only proper way, but since Youtube has time limitations, here’s just a bit of it sung by 10,000 Japanese people.

What It Looks Like:

If you flipped this upside-down, it’d be closer. The darker colors are usually on the bottom.

Composition VI, Kandinsky, 1913.

2. Tchaikovsky.

After Beethoven, Tchaikovsky is my favorite composer. He’s sometimes darker than Beethoven and just as complicated. I think Tchaikovsky has the most beautiful oeuvre of any composer. Picking just one example of Tchaikovsky is impossible. I can barely even listen to The 1812 Overture since it turns me into putty by the end, so here’s March Slave (that’s march as in a style of music and slave as in Slavic–it has nothing to do with slavery). I’m generally not a huge fan of the flute, but Tchaikovsky is the only composer who can make the flute give me goosebumps (starting at 2:13).

What It Looks Like:

Sort of like this, only a lot more colorful with a lot less orange.

Edtaonisl (Ecclesiastic), Francis Picabia, 1913.

3. Mussorgsky.

It’s tough to choose between Pictures At An Exhibition and Night On Bald Mountain, but this one gives me goosebumps every damn time I hear it and nearly makes me cry. The whole piece is gorgeous, but it’s the last movement that takes me over the edge and makes it so I can hardly breathe. It’s the percussion: the chimes, gong, cymbals et al. It is literally breathtakingly beautiful.

What It Looks Like:

Nothing can really capture how magnificent this piece of music is, but this Max Ernst painting kind of captures the energy and movement.

Max Ernst, 33 Girls Chasing Butterflies, 1958.

4. Holst

Ah, the planets. I’ve talked many time before about this piece. I think it’s one of the greatest ever written. I love the whole thing, but Jupiter is one of my favorites because it’s so heavy on the French Horn, my favorite instrument. The melodies that start at 1:45 and 3:04 are some of my favorite in all of music. Simply beautiful.

What It Looks Like:
It’s impossible to capture the whole piece, but this one reminds me a little bit of it with its starry background. It needs a whole lot more purple though to be accurate.

Composition with Pouring II, Jackson Pollack, 1943.

5. Barber

Adagio For Strings. Enough said. It’s one of the most beautiful pieces ever written. Visually, it doesn’t look as sad as it sounds. It’s more like birds flying at sunrise.

I’m having a hell of a hard time finding an image for this one. Nothing can really match Adagio For Strings. This one has similar tone, curves and color palette, but it’s got too many sharp angles and straight lines. There are no straight lines in Adagio For Strings. The movement actually looks much like the conductor’s hands making lazy circles.

Dance, an objectless composition, Alexander Rodchenko, 1915.

6. Prokofiev.

I love Prokofiev. I grew up with a battered and much-listened vinyl version of Peter And The Wolf. It’s still one of my favorites. Prokofiev knew each instrument intimately and had such a way with combining and using instruments, singling them out and putting them right back in the mix, like he did in Peter and The Wolf. Symphony #1 is a conversation between instruments in a hive. The violin starts a sentence, the woodwinds take up the middle and the brass finishes it. This is not my favorite Prokofiev, but hopefully, it will give you an idea what I’m talking about.

What It Looks Like:

Prokofiev is more structured and colorful, and less muddled than this Pollack, but the circular, almost woven quality about it, and the sunny tone of this painting sum it up nicely.

Shimmering Substance, Jackson Pollack, 1946.

7. Rimsky-Korsakov.

Are you sensing a pattern here? It seems I love the Russians. Fair enough. They make great music. Rimsky-Korsakov loved using the lower end of the register, which is why I love Rimsky-Korsakov, but he also knew how to balance it just perfectly. Sheherazade starts out with a bang and then the whole thing hangs off of one single violin. It’s dark, but it’s also uplifting and hauntingly beautiful. It’s like a forest.

What it looks like:

If this were shaped more like a triangle with the beautiful violin part at the top holding it up, it would be closer. The colors are right though. A sea of black with explosions here and there.

Une mime de rien (ou presque) – Asger Jorn, Asger Jorn, 1967.

8. Dvorák

A Czech! Dvorák, like the Russians, loved big sound. He used big, bold brushstrokes accented by finer ones. His music waxes and wanes like the moon pulling the oceans.

What It Looks Like:

Dvorák is more complicated than this painting, but the ferris wheel-esque thing in the lower left is very close and the black is the tympani. If you took this painting and made it more complicated and less red, that’s Dvorák.

The Prey, Hans Hoffman, 1956.

9. Puccini

It doesn’t matter which Puccini opera you listen to: La Boheme, Madama Butterfly, Gianni Schicchi, Turandot, Tosca. They all have at least one amazing song. Opera doesn’t get any better than Puccini. I highly recommend Nessun Dorma from Turandot, O Soave Fanciulla from La Boheme, Vogliatemi Bene, Un Bene Piccolino and Un Bel Di Vedremo from Madame Butterfly, and of course, this one:

Specifically, I love Maria Callas singing it. Her voice is technically not the most beautiful of all opera singers, but she did something better than anyone: emote. Her heart came out through her mouth every time she opened it and it’s beautiful.

What Maria Callas’ heart looks like:

Untitled, Ronnie Landfield, 1969.

10. Mozart

Lacrimosa (lachrymose) is Latin for “weeping” and this certainly does make me want to cry, but not necessarily because it’s sad. While it is a little mournful, it makes me want to weep because it is exquisitely beautiful.

What It Looks Like:

This is too geometrical, but the colors and tone are right.

Untitled, Alberto Burri, 1952.

Honorable Mentions

Shostakovitch Symphony # whichever. They’re all good. Here’s, oh… #5.
Vivaldi -Four Seasons, particularly Winter
Verdi – Trovatore Anvil Chorus
Delibes – Lakmé: Flower Duet
Orff – Carmina Burana: O Fortuna
Bach – Air On The G String
Copland – Fanfare For The Common Man
Handel- Arrival Of The Queen Of Sheba and Minuet II
Grieg – Peer Gynt: In The Hall Of The Mountain King
OK, this post could go on forever, but I’m ending it here. I hope you enjoyed my selections and maybe have a better sense of what it’s like to have synesthesia (probably not). Anyway, enjoy.

All images in this post are from http://www.wikipaintings.org.

12 Responses to “A Synesthete’s Guide To The Most Beautiful Music In The World”

  1. Emilia Jordan

    Hey, great blog :) This post was really fascinating. Sometimes it would be really cool to be able to spend some time inside someone else’s synesthesia. I love that you can hear music as color and see the music in art.

    ~EJ

    Reply
    • goldfish

      Thanks! I’d love to be able to write in color. That must be nifty. We should figure out a way to trade (just for a little while). ;)

      Reply
  2. weebee

    not to downplay the fantasticness of this entire post… but the line “a bit of it sung by 10,000 Japanese people” was really really funny to me. especially followed by the video, which was crazy. sooooo many ppl

    Reply
  3. draliman

    Wow, I wish I could see colours with music, it looks amazing! I’m not a huge classical music fan, but I do like two of your mentions – Peer Gynt and The Planets. Looking at the art, I’d be happy to have prints of numbers 1, 4 and 7 on my wall!
    My favourite music is more “pop”, and some of my favourite songs currently are “Pretender Got My Heart” (Alisha’s Attic), “Valley of the Dolls” (Marina and the Diamonds) and “Synchronized” (Sophie Ellis-Bextor) – all modern but I find them beautiful. I wonder what colours they would evoke?

    Reply
    • goldfish

      I often wonder if I love classical music because I can SEE how beautiful it is. Maybe if I could only HEAR it, I wouldn’t like it as much.

      I will happily take any of those artworks of if anyone would like to get me one. :)

      Reply
  4. Blathering

    I am not a huge devotee of classical music, although I hear it a lot, as I live with a classical music fan. There are some pieces I find beautiful, or occasionally spine-tinglingly powerful. Your descriptions of the music, and choice of images make this a really interesting read. And from what I recall about Abstract Expressionism (at least, in the periods those works are from), I think the artists would consider your choice of their work as the (approximate) visualisation of the music, as a sign that their art was successful!

    Reply
    • goldfish

      Thanks. The strange thing is, with the exception of a few, I’m not a huge fan of abstract expressionism. It’s just the closest art to what I see in my head. As I said to Draliman above, I wonder if the reason I like classical music at all is because of the visuals. If I didn’t have synesthesia, would I like it as much? Interesting to ponder.

      Reply
  5. dolcesuono

    I love this post. Excuse me if this is inconsiderate in any way, but I would love to see music as colour. I’m a huge fan of classical music and I love all of the pieces you mentioned, especially Dvorak 9, anything Mozart (but the Requiem is one of his best works, especially the Lacrimosa), Puccini, (Maria Callas was wonderful. I cried when I heard her Vissi D’Arte (from Tosca) for the first time) Verdi and Tchaikovsky. (You’re so right about the flute. There’s a moment in the third movement of Tchaikovsky’s 4th symphony, a couple of minutes in, when the flute has a solo and it’s just perfect). I had an art class two years ago where we had to make abstract art based on a piece of music and the piece we were given was ‘Jupiter’ by Holst. My finished piece of work looked awful (I’m rubbish at art) but this post reminded me of what can happen when music and art come together. Thank you for this writing. P.S. Would you mind if I reblogged this on my music blog?
    Best wishes :-)

    Reply
    • goldfish

      Thanks. Ooh, I love Tchaikovsky’s 4th. It’s so hard to just pick one by him. It was also difficult to select representative artworks since what I see is constantly moving with the music, but I did my best.

      You’re welcome to re-blog. Thanks for reading and commenting!

      Reply

Say something nice.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Basic HTML is allowed. Your email address will not be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 731 other followers

%d bloggers like this: